Sorry! This post contains interactive elements which your screen is too small to display properly.
Varieties of selection
First posted 2023-01-05

In the broadest sense, evolutionary theories describe how things change over time. In a narrower sense, evolution refers to the biological theory that explains the adaptedness of individual organisms due to natural selection. Owing to the success of selectionist approaches in biology, in the second half of the twentieth century several related theories sprung up in an attempt to expand this kind of evolutionary thinking to other domains.

The table opposite connects the standard approach to evolutionary biology -- the modern synthesis, with natural selection at its core -- to five related theories that extend it along two dimensions. First, the inheritance system described by a theory is the mechanism by which traits are passed down generations. Several potential inheritance systems are discussed by scientists, and the table displays two: genetic and cultural. Second, the trait bearers that a theory is concerned with are the entities whose change over time the theory describes: individuals, artefacts, or groups. Each theory attempts to account for the form and behaviour of trait bearers by appealing to selection acting on the relevant inheritance system.

The following works and theoretical approaches discuss two or more of the theories in the table. Hover and click to find out more:


Theoretical approaches



This post is a work in progress that will probably never be complete. If there are works or theories you'd like to see included, just email me.

Inheritance system
Genetic Cultural
Trait bearers Individual Modern synthesis Extended inheritance
Artefact Extended phenotype Memetics
Group Group selection Cultural group selection

Select a work or theory to display information here

The modern synthesis justifies explanations of the morphology and behaviour of individuals in terms of selection acting on genes.

The modern synthesis is the 'standard' theory of evolution at the heart of contemporary biology. It combines Darwin's theory of natural selection, which sought to explain the adaptive forms and behaviours of individual organisms, with twentieth-century discoveries in genetics.

Strictly, the modern synthesis encompasses more than just selection. While selection accounts for gene frequency change in terms of the adaptive benfits different genes enable, the theory discusses other processes of genetic change such as drift, which accounts for frequency change due to random chance.

See also:

Extended inheritance refers to the transmission of individual traits -- typically social behaviour -- via cultural mechanisms such as imitative learning.

Animals whose behaviour is not entirely determined by their genes sometimes learn behaviour by observing conspecifics. When transmission of behaviour repeats over many generations, it can give rise to evolutionary patterns distinct from those associated with genetic evolution.

The vast majority of work on extended inheritance focuses on human societies. See also:

The term extended phenotype refers to an expansion of the modern synthesis to include artefacts created by organisms, explaining their form and change over time by appealing to natural selection acting on genes.

For example, just as a bird is built by genes subject to natural selection, so a bird's nest is 'built' by those same genes via the intermediary of the bird itself. Adaptive features of the nest can therefore be explained by reference to natural selection, just like adaptive features of individual organisms.

The theory was introduced by Richard Dawkins his 1982 book of the same name. See also:

Memetics explains how artefacts change over time by appealing to cultural selection. A set of artefacts can be considered an evolving population, whose environment is constituted by a population of individuals. Artefacts are more successful when individuals find them useful, entertaining, or otherwise worth keeping and copying. Individuals need not choose items consciously. Ideas, behaviours or patterns of speech might get passed on "under the radar", so to speak. The term 'meme', coined by Richard Dawkins in The Selfish Gene, refers to artefacts considered from the perspective of cultural selection.

See also:

The view of natural selection as 'survival of the fittest' -- implying the success of individualistic and uncooperative behaviour -- has long been at odds with observations of widespread cooperation in nature. Group selection is a mechanism proposed to account for this discrepancy. The idea is that genes promoting cooperation between members of a group will lead to greater success for the group overall, and thus greater success for each individual within it. The theory explains group traits by appeal to selection on genes.

However, the vast majority of evolutionary biologists do not take group selection to plausibly occur in nature. Rather, many of the things group selection purports to explain are better explained by kin selection, an existing component of the modern synthesis. Debate between advocates of group selection and kin selection rose to prominence in the 1960s, and continues to some extent today.

See also:

Cultural group selection explains group traits by appeal to selection acting on cultural inheritance.

Cultural group selection explains the proliferation of behaviours due to the benefits they afford to the groups in which they appear. The theory typically focuses on traits that enhance group cohesion, such as conformity and participation in social activities, as well as traits that enhance the transmission of social behaviour, such as teaching and learning.

The term "cultural group" can have a few different meanings, so we should be careful about how it is used in this theory. As used here, a cultural group is any collection of individuals that share culturally transmitted traits. The definition is quite flexible: how many culturally transmitted traits must a group share before it becomes a cultural group?

Since cultural group selection was originally proposed to explain features of human sociality, the traits in question typically form robust clusters that are shared between all or most humans in a group (e.g. ritual practices, language or dialect, beliefs, and norms). This doesn't preclude other animals from forming cultural groups -- perhaps groups of humpback whales that share a song pattern could be considered a cultural group in the strict sense -- but the power of the theory to explain behaviour in those cases is weaker, because only one cultural trait is shared rather than a suite of socially relevant activities. It's not clear whether a single group trait like a song pattern could generate the kind of inter-group variation required for cultural group selection to occur.

See also: